<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Proposal - GeoRSS &#038; KML</title>
	<link>http://highearthorbit.com/a-proposal-georss-kml/</link>
	<description>Transmitting ideas, observations, and images from 42,000 km.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 04:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Geotag Icon :: High Earth Orbit</title>
		<link>http://highearthorbit.com/a-proposal-georss-kml/#comment-164669</link>
		<dc:creator>Geotag Icon :: High Earth Orbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 21:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://highearthorbit.com/a-proposal-georss-kml/#comment-164669</guid>
		<description>[...] of them that meant something slightly different. And KML is a visualization format, similar to HTML + CSS. GPX is a very specific format that works for handheld GPS units and PND&#8217;s. I&#8217;m [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] of them that meant something slightly different. And KML is a visualization format, similar to HTML + CSS. GPX is a very specific format that works for handheld GPS units and PND&#8217;s. I&#8217;m [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mapufacture blog &#187; KML Update and Clarification of OWS directive</title>
		<link>http://highearthorbit.com/a-proposal-georss-kml/#comment-103486</link>
		<dc:creator>mapufacture blog &#187; KML Update and Clarification of OWS directive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 17:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://highearthorbit.com/a-proposal-georss-kml/#comment-103486</guid>
		<description>[...] Other goals that have been discussed, but just haven&#8217;t been blogged (or documented) include: KML as Context document, KML and GeoRSS interoperability - though I blogged about it previously and have heard general acceptance of the ideas, Sensor streaming, and styling imported geometry. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Other goals that have been discussed, but just haven&#8217;t been blogged (or documented) include: KML as Context document, KML and GeoRSS interoperability - though I blogged about it previously and have heard general acceptance of the ideas, Sensor streaming, and styling imported geometry. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: High Earth Orbit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; KML 3 Kick-off, Module: Core</title>
		<link>http://highearthorbit.com/a-proposal-georss-kml/#comment-98992</link>
		<dc:creator>High Earth Orbit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; KML 3 Kick-off, Module: Core</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 16:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://highearthorbit.com/a-proposal-georss-kml/#comment-98992</guid>
		<description>[...] This list was derived from the current KML 2.1 tags and signifies the general concepts we&#8217;re hoping to have in KML Core - allow a user to express location, time, and possibly link to another KML document or service. In addition, providing the current Atom support allows for attribution and other interesting things for linking to HTML and GeoRSS. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] This list was derived from the current KML 2.1 tags and signifies the general concepts we&#8217;re hoping to have in KML Core - allow a user to express location, time, and possibly link to another KML document or service. In addition, providing the current Atom support allows for attribution and other interesting things for linking to HTML and GeoRSS. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Mann &#187; Michael Jones on GeoRSS</title>
		<link>http://highearthorbit.com/a-proposal-georss-kml/#comment-98906</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Mann &#187; Michael Jones on GeoRSS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 08:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://highearthorbit.com/a-proposal-georss-kml/#comment-98906</guid>
		<description>[...] Andrew has some thoughts on how GeoRSS and KML could work together. He simply sums it up as HTML : RSS :: KML : GeoRSS, which seems like a useful departure point for discussion. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Andrew has some thoughts on how GeoRSS and KML could work together. He simply sums it up as HTML : RSS :: KML : GeoRSS, which seems like a useful departure point for discussion. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeoRSS Weblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Michael Jones on GeoRSS</title>
		<link>http://highearthorbit.com/a-proposal-georss-kml/#comment-98885</link>
		<dc:creator>GeoRSS Weblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Michael Jones on GeoRSS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 06:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://highearthorbit.com/a-proposal-georss-kml/#comment-98885</guid>
		<description>[...] Andrew has some thoughts on how GeoRSS and KML could work together. He simply sums it up as HTML : RSS :: KML : GeoRSS, which seems like a useful departure point for discussion.     Posted by mikel Filed in General [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Andrew has some thoughts on how GeoRSS and KML could work together. He simply sums it up as HTML : RSS :: KML : GeoRSS, which seems like a useful departure point for discussion.     Posted by mikel Filed in General [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://highearthorbit.com/a-proposal-georss-kml/#comment-92111</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://highearthorbit.com/a-proposal-georss-kml/#comment-92111</guid>
		<description>@Ron - most of what I'm proposing works right now. However, the KML is using the 2.2 spec, which is a proposed - but unimplemented yet - spec. Hopefully this will be implemented and released soon in renderers. But even so, you can still use the format I'm proposing, you just won't see all the benefits yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ron - most of what I&#8217;m proposing works right now. However, the KML is using the 2.2 spec, which is a proposed - but unimplemented yet - spec. Hopefully this will be implemented and released soon in renderers. But even so, you can still use the format I&#8217;m proposing, you just won&#8217;t see all the benefits yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://highearthorbit.com/a-proposal-georss-kml/#comment-92092</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 11:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://highearthorbit.com/a-proposal-georss-kml/#comment-92092</guid>
		<description>I've been wondering about this topic.  Does your proposal "work" already? I can see that it works as far as cross-referencing the various formats, and putting appropriate content in each, but do the various renderers support it yet, or is that what you're proposing here?

Ron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been wondering about this topic.  Does your proposal &#8220;work&#8221; already? I can see that it works as far as cross-referencing the various formats, and putting appropriate content in each, but do the various renderers support it yet, or is that what you&#8217;re proposing here?</p>
<p>Ron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.664 seconds -->
