<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beyond Broadcasting: Mapping Public Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://highearthorbit.com/beyond-broadcasting-mapping-public-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://highearthorbit.com/beyond-broadcasting-mapping-public-media/</link>
	<description>Transmitting ideas, observations, and images from 42,000 km.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Build the Echo &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2008-06-20</title>
		<link>http://highearthorbit.com/beyond-broadcasting-mapping-public-media/#comment-190115</link>
		<dc:creator>Build the Echo &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2008-06-20</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://highearthorbit.com/?p=1041#comment-190115</guid>
		<description>[...] Beyond Broadcasting: Mapping Public Media :: High Earth Orbit (tags: beyondbroadcast public_media) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Beyond Broadcasting: Mapping Public Media :: High Earth Orbit (tags: beyondbroadcast public_media) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://highearthorbit.com/beyond-broadcasting-mapping-public-media/#comment-189922</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://highearthorbit.com/?p=1041#comment-189922</guid>
		<description>I agree on all accounts. Especially that there is still a lot of UX/Design effort that has to work to help guide the future of these tools. A mixture of GIS, Cartography, Interaction Design, and Usability have to converge together. 

There is currently a (hopefully) falling wall of "slap maps on sites" just for the sake of maps. Interaction designers are thinking now about what the purpose of a particular map interface is: search, exploration, visualization, etc. and then design the interface appropriately.

Regarding the general "public desire" for maps, looking at the interest in using light-weight placemarking tools for quick dropping of points or hikes demonstrates this. At least, a rising trend for people being able to "mark their territory" whether it be literally bounds of their travels, or more psychogeographical demarcations ("pretty sunset here")</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree on all accounts. Especially that there is still a lot of UX/Design effort that has to work to help guide the future of these tools. A mixture of GIS, Cartography, Interaction Design, and Usability have to converge together. </p>
<p>There is currently a (hopefully) falling wall of &#8220;slap maps on sites&#8221; just for the sake of maps. Interaction designers are thinking now about what the purpose of a particular map interface is: search, exploration, visualization, etc. and then design the interface appropriately.</p>
<p>Regarding the general &#8220;public desire&#8221; for maps, looking at the interest in using light-weight placemarking tools for quick dropping of points or hikes demonstrates this. At least, a rising trend for people being able to &#8220;mark their territory&#8221; whether it be literally bounds of their travels, or more psychogeographical demarcations (&#8221;pretty sunset here&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Thornett</title>
		<link>http://highearthorbit.com/beyond-broadcasting-mapping-public-media/#comment-189890</link>
		<dc:creator>James Thornett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://highearthorbit.com/?p=1041#comment-189890</guid>
		<description>Do you really think that the "The tools have become approachable and the public comfortable, even expecting, rich cartographic interfaces and exploration." ?

I'd agree that the visual tools for displaying geographical content/data are become very commonplace on interactive platforms but it still feels to me that the UX/design community has plenty of challenges ahead in making people feel comfortable when using these rich interfaces.

I've seen too often that developers/designers get very focussed on the possibilities of using maps/mapping and lose sight of the most important bit - making the most of the content or data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you really think that the &#8220;The tools have become approachable and the public comfortable, even expecting, rich cartographic interfaces and exploration.&#8221; ?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d agree that the visual tools for displaying geographical content/data are become very commonplace on interactive platforms but it still feels to me that the UX/design community has plenty of challenges ahead in making people feel comfortable when using these rich interfaces.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen too often that developers/designers get very focussed on the possibilities of using maps/mapping and lose sight of the most important bit - making the most of the content or data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
