Yesterday was quite a wash for me as I spent the day glued to the MythTV watching and catching up on curling for the US Men & Women.

One of my friends asked me: “Do you think you could beat the [US] men’s curling team” to which I said, and was reinforced yesterday “he** no”. They played incredibly well, though almost blew it a couple of times vs. Scotland Great Britain, despite having gotten 4 in the 3rd end.

The US Women, on the other hand, are not doing so well. I think my competitive team would have a shot against them. They’ve been playing better the last couple of games (which I saw all of) but apparently just missed enough rolls and hits in the first couple of games to lose too many of their games(which I guess I’m not sorry I missed).

A really odd, an entirely unexpected side effect of curling. Whenever I watch speed skating, or figure skating, I absolutely cringe and crawl out of my skin whenever I see someone chip the ice. I keep thinking – oh that’s going to take forever to fix.

So, in curling, like most other sports, there is an object that you, the player has possession of, in which the objective is to place that objective in a specified location. The object and location are largely what varies from sport to sport, as well as the mechanism for transporting this object. For example, Soccer (football) has a sphere, which can only be kicked, and should go into a net. By other example, curling has a stone, which may only be pushed behind a certain line on the ice, and then should come to rest closest to the center of the house on the other side of the ice.

Like baseball or basketball, curling measures “shot percentage”. This is the percentage of the time the player “makes their shot”. Now curling isn’t as definitive as say, a baseball player earning a base, or a basketball player making a shot. It’s more… subjective. When the skip called for a stone to be “a guard”, how do you measure that?

For example, lets look at the 1998 Winter Olympics Gold match between Sweden and Canada:

MEN
Gold Medal
Switzerland 9 Canada 3
Switzerland
Team: 81%.
D. Perren: 89%
D. Mueller: 86%
P. Loertscher: 72%
P. Huerlimann: 78%
Canada
Team: 64%
G. Karrys: 98%
C. Mitchell: 73%
R. Hart: 58%
M. Harris: 25%

So, Sweden won over Canada. And looking at the shot percentages, it’s pretty apparent why this happened. Strategy counts for a big portion of curling, like any sport. However, if you can’t make the shots, strategy goes right out the window. In fact, with the Canadian Skip making only 25% of his shots, this game was pretty much a blowout. Maybe the Skip and Lead should have switched spots.

For more information on how the shot percentages are calculated, check out:

• Guidelines for Shot Evaluation
• Shotmaking Percentages for Curling

A nice benefit of living in the SW Michigan Area of the big ‘D-City’ is the fact that there is one of the oldest, and in general superb, curling club. However, if I didn’t live in the area, I’d be in a pinch.

No longer, thanks to Custom Curling Rinks I can now have a ” Portable Roll-Out-Rink Curling Pad and refrigeration system.”