<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GeoWeb Standards &#8211; Discoverability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://highearthorbit.com/geoweb-standards-discoverability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://highearthorbit.com/geoweb-standards-discoverability/</link>
	<description>Transmitting ideas, observations, and images from 42,000 km.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:16:11 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9-rare</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://highearthorbit.com/geoweb-standards-discoverability/comment-page-1/#comment-273154</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 23:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://highearthorbit.com/geoweb-standards-discoverability/#comment-273154</guid>
		<description>Nice blog! I&#039;m open and keen to any simple solutions for webcrawlers and for humans. Please correct me, if I understand you wrong: 

For webcrawlers you propose embedding Atom-links in HTML and behind these Atom-Links there is a GeoRSS/Atom-File containing Atom link relation types, which indicate related services and even OGC services. 

=&gt; I like that, though I think we still need to get consensus about Atom link relation types for OGC services, don&#039;t we?

For humans, you propose to agree on a geotag, we need to agree upon. 
=&gt; Does this mean, you propose to make a different geotag icon e.g. for every single OGC Service WMS, WFS, etc.?

-S. 

P.S. In Fall 2008 there was the OGC Geospatial Search Summit. Is there any activity at OGC and between the former invited members?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice blog! I&#8217;m open and keen to any simple solutions for webcrawlers and for humans. Please correct me, if I understand you wrong: </p>
<p>For webcrawlers you propose embedding Atom-links in HTML and behind these Atom-Links there is a GeoRSS/Atom-File containing Atom link relation types, which indicate related services and even OGC services. </p>
<p>=&gt; I like that, though I think we still need to get consensus about Atom link relation types for OGC services, don&#8217;t we?</p>
<p>For humans, you propose to agree on a geotag, we need to agree upon.<br />
=&gt; Does this mean, you propose to make a different geotag icon e.g. for every single OGC Service WMS, WFS, etc.?</p>
<p>-S. </p>
<p>P.S. In Fall 2008 there was the OGC Geospatial Search Summit. Is there any activity at OGC and between the former invited members?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Gillies</title>
		<link>http://highearthorbit.com/geoweb-standards-discoverability/comment-page-1/#comment-271209</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Gillies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://highearthorbit.com/geoweb-standards-discoverability/#comment-271209</guid>
		<description>I shouldn&#039;t take this kind of bait, but as I recall, I was *mocking* the idea of icons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I shouldn&#8217;t take this kind of bait, but as I recall, I was *mocking* the idea of icons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
